Re: current bind version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term
stability without backports ... Unbuntu LTS is a free example.  They
also provide integration of all their system libraries and audit their
software for security compliance.

I think the primary driving factor for Redhat to employ the backport method is to maintain a stable ABI across a release, and the primary reason for that is for third party application support.

Redhat wants to provide a platform for which commercial vendors can develop their wares such that they can say it supports RHEL 5 or 6 and it will actually run on said platform without loss of functionality or stability.

I doubt the same can be said about Ubuntu LTS or even SLES where a change in a library can result in either the third party application not working or working with limited functionality.

-Ross

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux