On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> The FIRST build of a distribution (the .0 of 4.0 or 5.0) takes MUCH
>>> longer than the subsequent rebuilds. This is because you have NOTHING
>>> to start from except SRPMS. You also do not know the environment that
>>> upstream is using to run their "Build Roots" in. We also know nothing
>>> about which packages will and will not build as written (there are
>>> many that require us to research and provide hints to the build
>>> suystem. Hints are things that need to be added that are not called
>>> out in the SRPM).
>
>> CentOS 4.0 was released 23 days after RHEL4.0
>> CentOS 5.0 was released 29 days after RHEL5.0
>> CentOS 6.0 is *not* released 103 days after RHEL6.0
>
> en ?
>
> This is not a problem for me. I am contented to wait - en jij?
Hi Paul,
This was in a direct response to Johnny ;-) No worries, I put the context
back so it's clear *why* I replied this. It's not that I am impatient for
CentOS 6.0. In fact I switched to RHEL6.
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a direct security impact to users.
--
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info@xxxxxxxxx, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
