Re: BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:37:57PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> 
> THANKS for your input;  there exists a consensus, so that's what will
> be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x).  Troy says Fermi (a great target for
> the miscreants/actors) runs stock BIND as it appears in
> RHEL/CentOS/SL, so, to be redundant, what is good enough for the
> national labs is good enough for us.
> Joe won't be happy with us, but we need to be pragmatic.

	Just out of curiosity, have you ever thought about hiring a
	competent admin?





							John

-- 
Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offense. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit
communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about
solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy.

http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Attachment: pgpCAlVTKrQZE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux