On 02/17/2011 04:59 AM, Mark wrote: > This whole discussion is off-topic and getting to be really annoying. yes, please take it to somewhere more appropriate. - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:42:53 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=SoN0T7Zi6aJMYgVWuuxWZzkM3owH0QjJT4D6n@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
- References:
- some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Mark
- some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Prev by Date: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Next by Date: Re: foo2oak-wrapper
- Previous by thread: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Next by thread: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Index(es):
 |