Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?

[Larry Vaden <vaden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:36 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Â Â Â ÂHow is a HDD failure at $dayjob an issue of project-related
> Â Â Â Â"money"? ÂCan you perhaps conflate more?

There's a lot of difference between writing

"Was hoping to have
this done by the weekend but a series of unfortunate incidents ( like
large scale hdd failures ) meant that things at the $dayjob got a bit
hectic and this slipped a few days."

and writing

"Was hoping to have
this done by the weekend but a series of unfortunate incidents ( like
large scale hdd failures at the $dayjob) meant that things got a bit
hectic and this slipped a few days."

so, as I read it, I had help with the conflation.

Further, I'm surprised to learn that Karanbir's employer would go
against Karanbir's presumed advice against allowing such a situation
to develop.

Even further, the resistance to properly funding this project is truly amazing.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos