Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/15/2011 9:56 AM, R - elists wrote:
>> the "we" that we speak of is "our" organization, *not* of or for CentOS
>> and it's assigns

"its assigns" - it is not "it is assigns".
>>
>> we believe that CentOS could do more and that (humble opinion) the
>> CentOS team should be financially compensated fairly for their efforts
on all
>> of our behalf...
>
> How would they be different from Oracle if they did that as a business?

Lessee, there's no one on the team who's a billionaire, or has their own
fighter jet, and they're a HUGE amount more responsive than Oracle's tech
support....

        mark "I told y'all about my 'fun' with Oracle's support for Sun...."

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos