Re: server specifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2/14/2011 9:53 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> This system was initially commissioned after burn in, in late 2004 - An
> Intel mb. It started with RH9, then went FC3, then CentOS5.
> As mentioned the ECC memory has warned me when things are not well and
> allowed me to take remedial action before anything
> impacted my data. It still does great work six years later. For some
> reason, each time I have shifted it, we started getting these errors.
> It may be accumulated dust and dirt - so I always clean everything while
> it is down. Re-seating the RAM after cleaning the contacts and blowing
> out the dust has always worked. So for me, getting a server grade mb
> with ECC RAM is a great investment and worth the slight extra cost, not
> to mention that CentOS seems to have the drivers and modules in place
> for these mb.

I've seen that too, where moving a server would unseat RAM just enough 
to cause occasional crashes - and the crashes are better than undetected 
data/file errors.  We mostly use IBM servers that have some diagnostic 
lights in the front to make the problem obvious.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux