Re: Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5

[Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday, February 13, 2011 03:38 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Christopher Chan
> <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> On Saturday, February 12, 2011 09:02 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, neither in windows nor in unix/linux you want to specify
>>> permissions on a per user level. Always groups. If the user leaves the
>>> company and the permissions are on a per user level you need to start
>>> all over again. If on a per group level, just disable/remove the user
>>> from the group and it keeps working for the rest of members.
>>
>> And what do you do when you have cases that a user needs access to these
>> set of files/directories but not all the files/directories the group has
>> access to?
>
> If you are in such a scenario, then you have not planned your folder
> structure well enough :-)
>
> What do you do when you have thousands of users in your company? Do
> you keep individual permissions or do you use group permissions?
>
> I know what I'd rather do, specially if I need to audit that folder
> structure.
>

You are assuming that company structure is somehow sensible. Just saying 
that 'always groups' may not work everywhere.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos