Re: Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/11/2011 9:58 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> Be careful with saying such things.  A lot can be said about Windows as
>>> an operating system and Microsoft as a company.  But be very careful
about
>>
>> Yes, there can, and has been, a lot said. A *LOT* of it has not been
>> positive (at least since WinDoze 95). I can go on for a while, though
>> it's OT, as to their *lousy* design decisions, and then there's all the
>> lawsuits that they lost, where they paid to cut out competetors.
>
> But those have next to nothing to do with their current products.  If

They have *everything* to do. Look, I *said* this is OT, but since you
insist, the overwhelmingly *bad* design decision was to put the GUI into
ring 0, instead of the way Windows 3, and X on *Nix, and *everybody* else
did, resulting in a GUI error bringing down the *entire* system.
<snip>

        mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos