On 02/07/11 10:06 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > So, does anyone hav a centos 3.9 install arround that can send me the info > about (filesize, md5, modification date) these file : > is that a 3.9 install that never got any updates afterwards? is that x86_64 or i686? etc etc. that data is pretty worthless out of context. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:22:21 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <3D8430E2B28F45FCBDB32F3C12059674@versa>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- From: m . roth
- Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- References:
- Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- From: Nicolas Ross
- Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- Prev by Date: Autorun is VERY bad
- Next by Date: Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a Centos 3 around ?
- Index(es):
 |