Kellyremo wrote on Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:20:40 -0800: > Any opinions? Yes. Please carry it to the appropriate forum. Thanks. Kai _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 14:31:50 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <12dfaeaaf08.3832731923598495974.775306333545838672@xxxxxxxx>
- References:
- OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
- From: kellyremo
- OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
- Prev by Date: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
- Next by Date: if the file changes send email about diff
- Previous by thread: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
- Next by thread: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
- Index(es):
 |