On February 2, 2011 10:02:03 am Larry Vaden wrote: > Is there that much distrust of the current output of leading authors > that we need to "wait a long while"? You don't need to wait at all. Build your own packages or install from source. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:13:09 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTinuX6CNFdEo7dB0x+ATXbU4h+zGwm64x0GLr71+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: Simkin Network Consulting
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-25-generic; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; )
- References:
- Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- From: Karanbir Singh
- Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- From: Larry Vaden
- Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Prev by Date: Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Next by Date: Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Next by thread: Re: Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Index(es):
 |