On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:29 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:41 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > My RHEL 6 machine (fully updated) has kernel 2.6.32-71.14.1. > Alright, that's it, I want Centos 6 now! Me too. Yes please Mr Centos. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- From: Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:44:42 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4D3FB13A.7060505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: Better than M$ Windoze
- References:
- Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- From: Always Learning
- Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- From: Robert Heller
- Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- From: Always Learning
- Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- From: Barry Brimer
- Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- From: Christopher Chan
- Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Prev by Date: Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next by Date: Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next by thread: Re: Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Index(es):
 |