On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:31:17AM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Keith Keller wrote on Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:05:01 -0800: > > > grub's menu.lst > > sure, you don't mean grub.conf? grub.conf seems to be the "official" conf. A-ha! Yes, you are indeed correct. I suspect that my kickstart %post section removed the symlink and created a new menu.lst file, whereas on my other system menu.lst is still a symlink because I never attempted to mangle it. (I used a perl one-liner to modify menu.lst, and I've tested that perl -pi does remove a symlink to make a new file.) > Also, I wonder if you really want to comment *out* hiddenmenu? Yep. I really like to see everything! :) Thanks for the pointer--I will be sure to use grub.conf in the future. --keith -- kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpBsZh2WSyxA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
