Re: kernel security issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:34 +0000, "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On 01/25/2011 10:24 AM, Dave wrote:
> > after watching the security alerts for the centos kernel I've the
> > impression that altought they are fixed fastly there are more alerts
> > than for the vanilla one of the same version.
> 
> vanilla one for the same version isnt really that actively maintained is 
> it ? Also, the EL kernels contain a fair bit of backports which makes 
> things a bit more interesting.

Not sure. That's why I'm asking for. 
eg 2.6.32 >> 2.6.32.28 (longterm)
are there only improvements but no fixes?

On the other hand EL kernels are as far as I got information from here
more
adapted to Industry needs. So they have special code added vanilla
kernels don't have.
Right?

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux