On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hmmm.. You might befit from the portability of this approach >>> >>> %rhel 0%(/bin/rpm -q --f /etc/redhat-release -qf '%{VERSION}\n' ) >>> >>> Notice that this now works with RHEL and CentOS, and the "\n" keeps >>> certain programs historically happier with the commands having an EOL. >> >> Nice. Minor corrections needed: >> >> -f => --f >> -qf => --qf > > Sorry to spam the list again ... a correction of the correction needed :-) > > --f => -f > > So, it will be: > > %rhel 0%(/bin/rpm -q -f /etc/redhat-release --qf '%{VERSION}\n' ) > > Akemi Gahhh. Proportional fonts in this mail interfaces. We hates it, yes, we hates it!!!! Good catch, though. But why use '%{VERSION}' when '%{version}' will serve? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos