Dominik Zyla wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:57AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:06 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote: <SNIP> >> > Mbox is much more slower during >> > operations on it. It's because it's operate on single file, >> >> Correct, but who cares? If the server provides high-performance to the >> mailbox... why care? Message format storage wars are silly. > > I agree it's silly. But try to run dozens of maildirs and the same > number of mailboxes on the same kind of server. Mboxes would be > bottleneck of the entire mail system. And then there's the problem when your mailtool screws up the formatting of the mbox file.... mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos