On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/01/2011 05:56 PM, Dave wrote:
>>
>> Is there a best practice? People have to be doing something!
>
> I think that's unlikely. If you don't "oversubscribe" your disk space
> as a matter of policy, you'll force upgrades earlier than most people
> would consider them necessary. Most users, I'd expect, will be well
> under quota most of the time. You'd commit all of your disk space to
> quota long before the space was actually used. In your scenario, you'd
> be required to expand the disk array whenever it was committed to quota,
> even if actual use was very low. Every site that I know of which uses
> quotas handles disk upgrades when utilization requires it, not when
> quota subscription does.
So, is it fair to rephrase that as "ignore quotas, pay attention to
actual usage"?
I agree that some degree of oversubscription is probably desireable,
and it would be much easier to just add storage whenever it looks to
be getting fullish. My situation right now makes that difficult -
budget is gone, so I can't add storage, and my users sometimes start
up a big simulation that could potentially fill the disk right before
the weekend. If the hoggy simulation crashes itself, that's okay, but
if it brings down a lot of other jobs submitted by other users, I look
bad. I guess even if there was some good tool support, this task is
doomed to make everyone unhappy.
mahalo,
Dave
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
