On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:11 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/17/10 10:21 AM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: > The 2.x series of vmware server are badly broken with respect to RHEL/Centos - > plus the change to the web based console is horrible. Mine is not broken. The web Admin works like it should. > the server version. You do need a windows box to run the remote console, though. No you do not that is not so. The Console can be executed with out ever going to the web admin. As in the "plugin" can be executed with out firefox. John _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Intel NIC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Intel NIC
- From: JohnS <jses27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:36:54 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4D0B99D7.9000703@xxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intel NIC
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Intel NIC
- References:
- Intel NIC
- From: Helmut Drodofsky
- Re: Intel NIC
- From: Lamar Owen
- Re: Intel NIC
- From: Helmut Drodofsky
- Re: Intel NIC
- From: Les Mikesell
- Intel NIC
- Prev by Date: centos 5.5 x86_64 mixing with i386 rpms
- Next by Date: Re: centos 5.5 x86_64 mixing with i386 rpms
- Previous by thread: Re: Intel NIC
- Next by thread: Re: Intel NIC
- Index(es):
 |