On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Bart Schaefer
<barton.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From the time the problem began, it had to do with
>>
>> Error: Missing Dependency: libx264.so.68 is needed by package
>> cinelerra-2.1-0.15.20070108.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
>>
>> However, cinelerra was *never* one of the packages set to be updated.
>
> The problem may be that libx264 was set to be updated, but could not
> be because installed package cinelerra had an absolute dependency on
> an older version (rather than an "at least" dependency).
<snip>
> I seem to recall having to drop several packages that depended on a
> specific libx264 version a while ago, but I no longer remember which
> ones (lua related, possibly?).
Bart: Thank you for the explanation! That's probably what happened. Lanny
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
