On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:04 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/14/2010 10:46 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Yup. > > <snip> > >> yet-another-syntax for config files. But, it is somewhat hard to scale > >> and maintain because people write in different styles and things that > >> start small tend to have a lot of global variables that are hard to > >> remember as the code grows. And perl is not great for GUI programs. > > *snarl* > > There is *no* excuse for lots of globals. Pass your stuff. The most > > complicated programs I've ever written in perl (I guess that was the > > billing system for a very small telecom, 600-700 lines or more) had less > > than 10 globals, and maybe less than five (it's been 6 years since I was > > there, so I don't remember). Using globals is *lousy*, *lazy* programming, > > and I wouldn't trust folks that write anything more than a 20 or 30 line > > script to program *anything* until they'd gone back and internalized > > modular coding. And then I'd review their code for the next six months.... > > <snip> > Keep in mind that you can do some amazing things with a 30 line... in just about any language [funny, Perl, Python, PHP, people all trot this one out to advocate their favorite language]. It is true in all of them. Personally I've banned Perl from the network primarily because of the maintenance disaster that is CPAN. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos