Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/8/2010 3:41 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> /That/ is my point.  I could -- and sometimes do -- work around file
> permissions errors manually, quickly.  SELinux has a higher order of
> complexity compared to Unix file permissions, so the associated fixes
> don't fit into a small, easy-to-mentally-model framework.  Each fix
> therefore becomes a one-off that you have to write down in a document or
> script else you'd have to rediscover them with Google every time.

Is there any central reporting concept in SELinux so a multi-machine 
admin doesn't have to go check each for all of the one-off cases and 
knowledge can be shared about the fixes needed for 3rd party RPMs?


-- 
    Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos