On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 01:47:07 pm Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Sandbox -X might help solve some of these problems. Available in RHEL6 > http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/31146.html?thread=212906 Looks interesting, Dan. Thanks much. And thanks much for the sometimes thankless work of trying to make the power of SELinux more easily accessible. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- From: Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:39:16 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4CFFD2AB.3050303@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: PARI
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64; KDE/4.5.3; x86_64; ; )
- References:
- SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- From: Alison
- Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- From: Daniel J Walsh
- SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Prev by Date: Re: apache ssl config
- Next by Date: Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Previous by thread: Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Next by thread: Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
- Index(es):
 |