Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 05:29:09 am Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> > No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the
>> world.
>
>> False. That is *NOT* a downside.
>
> In your opinion. Others hold a different opinion. While security through
> obscurity doesn't help in many circumstances, there are physical security
> controls that absolutely depend upon it, and work. Physical lock and key,
> for one (the pinning must be kept obscure). Physical combination locks,
> for another; they depend upon keeping the gates in the wheels obscure.
> For that matter, any security that depends on any 'secret' is in essence a
> security through obscurity technique. Port knocking is a security through
> obscurity technique (which works quite well).
<snip>
Sorry, let me jump in here: how is a "hidden" IP address, whether it's
10.x, or 192.168.x, obscurity. Rather, AFAIK, trying to get there from
outside are unreachable, because the addresses are not valid on the 'Net
itself.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
