On 12/03/2010 03:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Was this on 32-bit RH/Centos where the 4k stacks are a known problem for > XFS? Both 32 and 64 bit kernels. -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) -- "Deserve Victory." -- Terry Goodkind, Naked Empire _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- From: John Jasen <jjasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:43:39 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4CF95032.7000805@xxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10
- References:
- XFS or EXT3 ?
- From: Keith Roberts
- Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- From: Matty
- Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- From: John Jasen
- Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- From: Les Mikesell
- XFS or EXT3 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: shutdown script
- Next by Date: Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- Next by thread: Re: XFS or EXT3 ?
- Index(es):
 |