Re: fsck - and there was much rejoicing

[Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
> reasonable speed.

Hey, let us know how long that 1.4T fsck takes if you don't mind.  Longwinded e2fsck's are a bane on reboot times on critical VM's, and I have a number of VM's with 2TB ext3 filesystems, some of which haven't had an fsck in..... well, too long. 

And I'll echo the kudos to the intrepid bug-fixers.  Long and interminable e2fsck's have been with us a long time.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos