Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/30/10 12:31 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> And I notice that you don't address the other point, all the in-house
> apps, and if you think management will say "sure, spend whatever it takes
> to rewrite that so it conforms to selinux...", you're living in somewhere
> I don't. And just about everywhere I've worked, both as a developer and as
> a sysadmin had a *lot* of in-house apps.

90% of the time, you just have to reorganize the application 
installation directories to better suit the default settings.

for instance, all our java-ware can run just fine in 
/home/$APPUSER/$APPNAME and run as a regular user.   if we want to put 
it in /opt/$COMPANY/$APP  then we might have to play with selinux 
defaults some, since /opt isn't part of the RHEL mindset.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux