Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/30/2010 3:13 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> P.S. I am just waiting for the day when SELinux is going to become locked in
> enforcing mode by the kernel developers, much as the traditional permissions
> system is a mandatory thing right now. :-D

I thought there was a security API in the kernel that was designed 
specifically _not_ to lock it to an implementation.  Is there a 
standards group for SELinux?  It's one thing to follow Posix, something 
else to be locked to a non-standard concept.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux