Re: SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/29/2010 10:46 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> How much 3rd party software do you run where someone else has not
>> already spent the time to work out the policies needed to let it work?
>
> And how much in-house developed software do you run? Or, about those 3rd
> party software, do you run my own personal PITA, CA's $$$ SiteMinder?

In-house software with 3rd party components and stuff running under Java 
is the main reason for most of our machines.  I'm not sure we'd have any 
that just use the base distro packages.  Some stuff uses SUSE because 
the developer claims their realtime kernel is required for performance. 
  Letting SELinux break other things would be turned into an argument to 
move them to SUSE.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux