It depends on what hardware you have available and what all you would
like to play with...I run both tomato and pfsense and both are great
products but both serve a particular setting...I use tomato for AP's
primarily but also use it for a soho router much better than
linksys...but if you want more routing functionality/security like
openvpn and more available packages to play with then pfsense is a
good choice...if you want or need more filtering capabilities then you
could also look at untangle (much more hardware intensive) or
endian...I have used/using all of the above...all of them have
advantages and tradeoffs just depends on what your requirements are...
On 11/22/10, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> Blake Hudson a écrit :
>>>> Is there anything you could especially recommend for this job? (I'm not
>>>> afraid of getting my hands dirty, BTW :oD)
>>>>
>>> +1 for Linksys WRT54GL and tomato firmware
>>> +1 for pfsense (or monowall) on a small server
>>
>> Thanks for the many answers in this thread. I'm not a native speaker, so
>> one more question. Does "tomato" firmware mean the original firmware as
>> installed by Linksys, or some third-party firmware like OpenWRT and
>> DD-WRT?
>
> Third party. I have friends who swear by it.
> <http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato> is the first hit when you google tomato
> wrt54gl
>
> mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
