Re: RHEL 6 Officially Released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/11/2010 9:30 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
>>> would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
>>> has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end, but it took a lot longer than
>>> doing a clean install.
>>>
>> That's the point.
>>
>> The cost to upgrade is probably higher than a clean installation.
>>
>> It has changed so much between RHEL5 and RHEL6.
>>
>> I recommend everyone a clean installation.
>
> I think the only 'clean' upgrade I had was Centos 5.2 ->  5.3 and that
> happened by accident!

Errr, you should be able to 'yum update' any 5.x to any other with few 
surprises.  Did you mean 4.2 as the starting point there?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux