Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Folks,
>
>     Thanks a *lot* to those who suggested I try fsck -cc - that took six
> hours, and at the end, I was standing there, and it tells me that
> there's two back blocks, one was /dead/base.pp, and... (wait for it)
> bad blocks, in node 1.
>
>     I said yes, fix them, and rebooted, and I don't see complaints.
>
>           mark "and there was much rejoicing"

you're welcome, glad I could help (for once :-) )
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux