On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You probably are forwarding packets to the other end of the vpn. Does whatever
> is on the other end have a route back to your 192.168.144.x range through that
> end of the vpn?
Ah, that may indeed be the problem. I'm a bit rusty with this stuff.
The CentOS box is doing IP forwarding, but that doesn't mean that it's
actually acting as a NAT? On the far end, 192.168.144.0/255 would
just use the default route, which is to the gateway for the network to
which the VPN is connected. There's no explicit route for my LAN
range.
> Connections from the server itself will source from the tunnel
> address, not the LAN.
Well, yeah, that part I expected. I was presuming the return packets
would go back to the tunnel address, which would send them to my
server, which would then NAT them back to the original LAN source; but
maybe that translation isn't happening where I thought it was.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
