On 11/3/2010 12:22 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Maybe try fsck -cc for a non-destructive read-write test. Good call. That's resilvering. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- From: Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:50:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4CD1A87C.90602@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- From: m . roth
- Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- References:
- PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: Keith Roberts
- Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: William Warren
- Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: Keith Roberts
- Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: Keith Roberts
- Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: Warren Young
- Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: m . roth
- Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- From: Warren Young
- Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- From: m . roth
- Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
- PATA Hard Drive woes
- Prev by Date: Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- Next by Date: Re: PATA Hard Drive woes
- Previous by thread: Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- Next by thread: Re: was, PATA Hard Drive woes, is "SMART"
- Index(es):
 |