On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What is the rationale behind deactivating Sendmail. Just curious. Or is it > the typical rant "Sendmail is insecure, see its history"? I don't understand why many people calling sendmail insecure. Sendmail is the default MTA in RHEL, Solaris, AIX, FreeBSD, OpenBSD ... Why should they use an insecure MTA? Sendmail is a very robust and reliable MTA. Best regards, Morten _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: sendmail substitute?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: sendmail substitute?
- From: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:55:09 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <2458.217.244.14.211.1287040301.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sendmail substitute?
- From: Baird, Josh
- Re: sendmail substitute?
- References:
- sendmail substitute?
- From: Roland RoLaNd
- Re: sendmail substitute?
- From: Alexander Dalloz
- sendmail substitute?
- Prev by Date: Re: installing centOS on extended partition
- Next by Date: Re: installing centOS on extended partition
- Previous by thread: Re: sendmail substitute?
- Next by thread: Re: sendmail substitute?
- Index(es):
 |