On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 06:16:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 10/13/2010 6:01 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > lastlog is a sparse file. How it looks and how big it is are two > > different things. > > And how long it takes to copy if you back the system up is a 3rd thing. Get better backup software that understands sparse files. You'll have the same problem with dbm files and similar. > But if you've truncated to 32 bits it might be tolerable anyway. On The bit-size of the OS is irrelevant to the maximum file size. Otherwise we'd still be stuck at 2Gb (maybe 4Gb) files on 32bit systems. > 64-bit centos3, nfsnobody made that somewhat awkward, at least in the > early versions - it might have been fixed eventually. People logged in as nfsnobody? That's the only way lastlog should get that entry. Then you have bigger problems... -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos