Ryan Manikowski wrote on 10/11/2010 07:49 PM: ... > One method to obscure the presence of the ssh daemon would be to use > port knocking: > > http://dotancohen.com/howto/portknocking.html Somehow I suspect the OP may have seen that one. :-D Phil _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:56:27 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4CB3A27D.1090008@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100912)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- From: Lamar Owen
- Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- References:
- One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- From: Ryan Manikowski
- One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- Prev by Date: Re: security updates
- Next by Date: Re: SquashFS: how good is it?
- Previous by thread: Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- Next by thread: Re: One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
- Index(es):
 |