On 05/10/10 02:49, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Monday 04 October 2010 12:35, Mark wrote: > >> I'll probably put LO beta on my laptop and play with it a little >> before I decide. There is a caveat that LO might install over OO in >> this beta, but future releases won't. > > The warning that LibreOffice overwrites OpenOffice only applies to > Windows. On my system, LibreOffice installed itself neatly > in /opt/libreoffice3. > Indeed. :-) Redhat have stated they will support LibreOffice, but considering LibreOffice is merely a beta at the moment an early one at that, I highly doubt RH would put that into RHEL5/6, bearing in mind that RHEL is all about stability and reliability. Imagine 50 networked machines, using LibreOffice Beta, after they just added a new feature, and the new feature accidentally causes constant segfaults, it would be a disaster in an enterprise environment. :-O I'd expect Fedora 15/16 (Possibly 14, but I think it's too far it for them to change it now, not sure though) to see LibreOffice first. Then after it'll fall into RHEL, at which point I don't know, possibly 6.2? 6.4? All depends on stability of the product, however it may not ever make it into RHEL6 and end up only in RHEL7+. As for RHEL5? I'm not sure. But, of course all this is speculation, and could be wrong. I too checked out LibreOffice when it was released (F12 here at the moment) I soon switched back to OpenOffice.org 3.1 though :-( but, it's an early product, you can't expect it to be perfect just yet :-). (even if it is a fork) LibreOffice has the potential to be great, and the publicity/support they needed. Lets just hope they do just that. Anyhow, just my 2p :-) Sorry for any spelling/grammar issues, been up all night and am tired, only coffee keeping me going right now :D. -- Jake _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos