> No one seems to like AD. I actually find it to be fairly manageable compared > to stock LDAP/Kerberos. The management tools blow OpenLDAP out of the > water. I laugh at myself saying it, but if you want simple management of a > big installation, AD is pretty dang tested these days and it's not hard to > integrate other systems in that environment if you have admin control of the > schema. Microsoft have always been good at pretty GUIs for managing their product. It's why NT Domains succeeded and NIS+ failed, despite being very similar in concept. Microsoft are _also_ learning why scripted access to their products is essential. Eventually they'll have the benefits of built-in adequate usable management tools and the flexibility of programmatic interfaces and it'll be a lot harder to justify Unix for infrastructure purposes. Which'll put me out a job! -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos