On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:*shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but
>
> Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it.
>
> When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the manual. When
> I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more
> secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly and not a recommended
> solution.
AD as an alternative....
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks... what is AD? I never even heard of that.
I think we are going to LDAP at some point - due to its universality if for no other reason.
Boris.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
