----- Original Message -----
| On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| > It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over
| > netcat instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory.
| > It would be a steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up
| > on the file system as bad as rsync would.
|
| I'll trade being able to stop/start and repeat the same command
| (rsync)
| for a few extra packets over my local net any day.
|
| --
| Les Mikesell
| lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| CentOS mailing list
| CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
| http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Keep in mind I mentioned "to initially populate the directory". Had the tar over netcat failed you could still then use rsync to restart.
Just a thought is all. ;)
--
James A. Peltier
Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail : jpeltier@xxxxxx
Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca
MSN : subatomic_spam@xxxxxxxxxxx
Does your OS has a man 8 lart?
http://www.xinu.nl/unix/humour/asr-manpages/lart.html
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
