Top posting, I'll apologize also.
Hey, I appreciate the moderation - I've mentioned before, the general
Redhat list, we've gotten spams, and it takes days or weeks before the
alleged moderator gets around to answering a number of us and does
something.
mark
m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> >
>>> > http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launches_a_new_linux
>>> >
>>> > oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
>>> >
>>> Um, this is news? I thought Oracle pushed "Unbreakable Linux" out
>>> the door at *least* last year.
>>
>> read the article carefully. this isn't unbreakable linux, that *is*
>> old news. this is oracle's (alleged) followup.
>
> You're right - they've announced unbreakable unbreakable linux, u^2 linux.
> <g>
>
> But then, you have heard that in the latest release of Sun's, er, Oracle's
> java, they changed the identifier to read Oracle, rather than Sun
> Microsystems, and for some idiot java (sorry, I repeat myself) reason, a
> fair number of packages out there, including ALL VERSIONS OF ECLIPSE for
> the last 3-4 years, break, because they can't find those magic words,
> rather than just looking at versions...?
>
> mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
