On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 05:51 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > (another in an ongoing list of things i just want to clarify for the > sake of future courses taught on centos.) > > from this RHEL doc page: > > http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-openssh-server-config.html > > the reader is advised to, for the sake of security, remove/disable > vsftpd, ostensibly in favour of sftp/sftp-server. really? There is nothing wrong with locking it down in Read Only file structures. John _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
- From: JohnS <jses27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:02:21 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009170548060.18027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
- From: Robert P. J. Day
- should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
- Prev by Date: Re: looking for cool, post-install things to do on a centos 5.5 system
- Next by Date: Re: should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
- Previous by thread: should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
- Next by thread: Re: should vsftpd be disabled in favour of sftp for security reasons?
- Index(es):
 |