On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:53:42AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:39:07 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > > At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is an article I wrote about doing this:
> > >
> > > http://www.deepsoft.com/2009/01/how-to-transfer-a-linux-system-from-one-disk-to-another/
> > >
> > Hoewver, I've heard (though not deeply investigated), that
> > due to various things in the Linux kernel, dump restore isn't the best
> > approach for Linux, and there will be metadata loss.
> > ....If Robert has been doing it successfully, then, chances are
> > he's right. (Perhaps these changes in the Linux kernel are newer than
> > the CentOS kernel.)
>
> I've used dump & restore so many times over the years with Linux
> systems to believe there is nothing wrong with using dump & restore.
> Note: dump & restore are only for ext2/ext3. It does not work for
> riserfs, xfs, etc. I don't know about ext4 (and the problems you've
> heard about might be related to ext4 or something else).
Thanks much for the quick reply. The things that I would bother moving
(vs. a reinstall, for less important things) are all on ext3, so this is
VERY handy. (Especially, since as mentioned, it's what I'm used to from
the BSDs. )
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
