On 08/29/2010 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 8/28/10 11:04 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: >> On 08/28/2010 12:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On 8/28/10 10:29 AM, ganu MailList wrote: >>>> I had set the initdefault as 5 >>>> >>> >>> 5 comes after 1,2,3, etc. >> >> I do hope you were making a joke and not really claiming that >> the system progresses through runlevels 2, 3, and 4 on its >> way to runlevel 5. > > Progressing through the run levels is the way it is supposed to work to ensure > that the complex and necessary sequence of processes started by init are done in > the right order when you change levels either direction. At least that's the > way it was designed in unix. Linux sometimes cheats - and using runlevel 5 to > start X was sort of an afterthought. I guess you could wade through the /etc/rc > script to see what it does these days. The script goes directly to the specified runlevel. Nothing from the other /etc/rc.d/rc[0-6].d directories is examined at all. That's the way it has been for a long, long time. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos