On 8/29/10 11:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:37:06AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >>>> 5 comes after 1,2,3, etc. >>> I do hope you were making a joke and not really claiming that >>> the system progresses through runlevels 2, 3, and 4 on its >>> way to runlevel 5. >> Progressing through the run levels is the way it is supposed to work to >> ensure that the complex and necessary sequence of processes started by >> init are done in the right order when you change levels either direction. >> At least that's the way it was designed in unix. Linux sometimes cheats - >> and using runlevel 5 to start X was sort of an afterthought. I guess you >> could wade through the /etc/rc script to see what it does these days. > > It's not really "cheating" -- or "these days", for that matter. Runlevels in > Red Hat and related distros have always been discrete steps, rather than > cumulative. It kind of misses the point of the design if you have to start the network anyplace but runlevel 3. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos