James Hogarth wrote:
>> Why? The current CentOS kernel isn't anywhere near the latest, nor is a
>> fair bit of other stuff in CentOS 5.5. And there are lots of folks
>> running yr-old releases.
>
> I... I... I don't really know how to answer this one...
>
> Anyone who is running *CentOS* from a year ago is strongly urged to
> upgrade... they always have been on this list. There have been plenty
I agree... but some won't, or can't. I've got someone here who insists on
running RHEL 3, because of collaborators around the world who can't
upgrade.
<snip>
> If you showed up on the Spacewalk mailing list saying you have a 0.5
> instance with X problem the first thing to be said is at least get up
> to 1.0 as there have been so many bug fixes over a year that it
> becomes difficult to troubleshoot an issue and any fix found will not
> be backported to 0.5 but rather released as either a hotfix to the
> current version or fixed in the next release.
Fortunately, that was on a previous job, and we have something here that
a) doesn't need a d/b, and b) is *nowhere* near as outright hostile to
install and configure. I've been burned, badly, and don't care to use it
again.
<snip>
>> I was on the mailing list. Did they ever put the change to the
>> documentation that I sent in, that I found, about the settings required
>> to make Oracle happy to work with it?
>> <snip>
>
> I did mention a dependency on Oracle. I, and others, followed the
> instructions on the wiki and got an instance running fine. What did
> you mention specifically? Looking at the website there are steps to
> follow for oracle:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/OracleXeSetup
>
> Please only comment on stuff you have genuine *current* knowledge of
> and not something you dabbled in a year ago... technology changes
> quickly especially in a product under heavy and active development.
>
I didn't "dabble", my manager and VP insisted I get it up asap. And I just
went to the page, above, and no, it does *not* mention what I found, which
is that I had to go into Oracle admin, and up the memory available to,
mmm, I think it was 995M, where the default is only 940M, and that was the
*only* way to get around the stop-dead-in-my-tracks problem.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
