Chris Mauritz wrote: <snipped> Oy....I'm terribly sorry. Moderator, please delete my previous message. It was supposed to be a private message to Peter. Bryan, please accept my apology. It wasn't my intention to riducule you in public. honest injun.... <blush> Must drink less coffee.... Cheers, C
Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- From: chrism at imntv.com (Chris Mauritz)
- Date: Thu Jun 30 23:26:53 2005
- In-reply-to: <42C47EC0.7040409@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <16383038.1120169297166.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200506301918.13935.loony@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <42C47EC0.7040409@xxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- From: Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- From: Peter Arremann
- Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- From: Chris Mauritz
- Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- Prev by Date: Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- Next by Date: What is the latest STABLE release?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- Next by thread: Re: Hot swap CPU -- "build" is not a good CPU benchmark
- Index(es):
 |