I'm not going to respond to any of this, except this part ... On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 19:30 -0400, Chris Mauritz wrote: > the OCD-esque posting frenzies ... > not being able to control OCD-like urges ... As I said, the "troll" label is not just a "singularity." Please re-read your statements above, and think about it. -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx
Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- From: b.j.smith at ieee.org (Bryan J. Smith)
- Date: Tue Jun 28 23:57:47 2005
- In-reply-to: <42C1DD9C.3010100@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <23509628.1119995189718.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1120000825.3405.12.camel@cad-station-7> <42C1DD9C.3010100@xxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- From: Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
- Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- From: Ajay
- Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- From: Chris Mauritz
- Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- Prev by Date: Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- Next by Date: Re: Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- Previous by thread: Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- Next by thread: Offtopic Posts [was Re: [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing]
- Index(es):
 |