On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 16:18 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > The plan for Directory Server for CentOS-4 is to port RedHat Directory
> > Server (and not Fedora Directory Server) when it is released for RHEL.
> > That should happen when RedHat thinks it is stable for production in the
> > enterprise ... I would assume that they will charge for it like they do
> > for RHGFS/RHCS when they feel they have it stable.
>
> I thought that have been doing that since the AOL deal last year?
> It had been available on the RHN for awhile, in the unchanged/original form.
>
> Unless I was mistaken, the deal was that AOL would allow Red Hat to
> GPL it after an undisclosed number of sales had occurred _or_ by April 30,
> 2005, whichever came first.
>
> The new FDS and RHDS releases are just more updated/integrated releases
> with the Red Hat product line. E.g., more integrated SASL/Kerberos
> integration with Red Hat's offerings out-of-the-box. Previously there was
> a lot of post-install work to get Kerberos working via GSSAPI.
>
Right ... more intergration.
RedHat Directory Server 7.1 should be released fairly soon:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050628/692dec54/attachment.bin
